Excerpt 1 AUGUSTINE OF HIPPO 354430 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the. Free PDF Books, Download The Best Free Ebooks the best and most complete ebook directory. BibMe Free Bibliography Citation Maker MLA, APA, Chicago, Harvard. Looked like a snow globe out there for awhile. Now, its practically Spring Older Daughter and I went and did what wed been talking about doing for years, now that her Break and mine finally coincided went to Floridas Grapefruit League Spring Training Day after day of waking to 7. Baseball and bliss. But that was then. Now, Montaigne Bakewell on How to Live accing to M. One good way to live, he thought, was by writing and reflecting on our many uncertainties. Embracing and celebrating them, in fact. That makes him an anti Descartes, a happy and humane modern skeptic. One thing we know for sure is the historical timeline. Montaigne comes first, but since I always introduce him as the anti Descartes he rarely gets top billing. The late Robert Solomon did the same thing. Not fair, for a guy who gave us the essay and as Sarah Bakewell says is so much fun to read. Unlike Descartes he was a true skeptic again though, not so far over the cliff as Pyrrho and quite happy to live with that. His slogan was Que sais je Montaigne retired in his mid 3. He inscribed the beams of his study with many of his favorite quotes, including nothing human is foreign to me and the only certainty is that nothing is certain. Some of Montaignes life lessons and rules for how to live, as decoded by Sarah Bakewell Dont worry about death Pay attention Question everything Be convivial Reflect on everything, regret nothing Give up control Be ordinary and imperfect Let life be its own answer. Montaigne leaps from the page as mindful, both ruminative and constantly attentive to the present moment. He has good advice for the walker. When I walk alone in the beautiful orchard, if my thoughts have been dwelling on extraneous incidents for some part of the time, for some other part I bring them back to the walk, to the orchard, to the sweetness of this solitude, and to me. Sarah Bakewell quotes Montaigne, disabusing us of the false image of him brooding in his tower. He was a peripatetic, too My thoughts fall asleep if I make them sit down. My mind will not budge unless my legs move it. So, like Emerson he might have said my books are in my library but my study is outdoors. Theres just something irresistibly alluring about the candid and disarming familiarity of his tone, thats drawn readers to this original essayist for four and a half centuries and obliterates the long interval between him and us. He makes uncertainty fun. The highest of wisdom is continual cheerfulness. Montaigne dawn. M on Self esteem de. B. M quotes. Ms beam inscriptions. M In Our Time BBC. Ms tower. Ms Essays. Also today, well consider the philosophical status of science. Montaigne the fallible skeptic actually had a better handle on it than Descartes, the self appointed defender of scientific certainty. Thats because science is a trial and error affair, making essays or attempts at evidence based understanding through observation, prediction, and test, but always retreating happily to the drawing board when conjectures meet refutation. To answer some of my own DQs today Q Are there any authorities personal, textual, political, religious, institutional, traditional. Can you justify this, intellectually or ethically A I dont think so. Whenever I feel a deferential impulse coming on I remind myself of the Emerson line about young men in libraries. Q Can you give an example of something you believe on the basis of probability, something else you believe because it has to be true follows necessarily from other premises you accept as true, and something you believe because you think its the best explanation Do you think most of your beliefs conform to one or another of these kinds of explanation A Hmmm. The sun will probably rise within the hour. Im mortal. Life evolves. Yes. Q Do you think science makes genuine progress Does it gradually give us a better, richer account of the natural world and our place in itIs there a definite correlation between technology and scientific understanding Do you think there is anything that cannot or should not be studied scientifically Why A Yes, yes, yes, no. Science is a flawed instrument, because the humans who practice it are finite and fallible but we have nothing to take its place. We shouldnt be scientistic, to the neglect of all the other tools in our kit including poetry, literature, history, humor, but we definitely should be as scientific as we can. Wednesday, March 1. Descartes. Rene Descartes, not at all Pythons notwithstanding a drunken fart, simply wanted to know what he could know for certain. He asked his version of the Howard Baker question. The majority of students in my Tennessee classrooms could not identify the statesman Senator when asked, the other day. Sigh. His skepticism was methodological, his goal was indubitable certainty. This, he thought, would serve the new science well. He misunderstood the self correcting, probabilistic, fallibilistic nature of empirical reasoning. But most philosophers still think its worth wondering how do you know youre not dreaming, not being deceived by a demon or by your senses, not mistaking your own essential nature Still, cogito ergo sum overrates intellect. You dont have to think, to demonstrate your existence. You just have to do something even, as an old grad school pal used to say, if its wrong. NOTE TO CLASS I flip flopped Descartes and his predecessor Montaigne, the anti Descartes, on our syllabus Descartes before the horse M. Descartes different aspects mathematician, scientist, Catholic etc. Teams Aristotle and Plato. Both would probably like to claim him. I think he belongs with the armchair Platonists. Reducing the operations of the universe to a series of lines,circles, numbers, and equations suited his reclusive personality. His most famous saying, I think, therefore Iam cogito, ergo sum, could be stated less succinctly but more accurately as Because we are the only beings who do math, we rule. For Descartes, the essence of mind is to think, and the essence of matter is to exist and the two never meet. The Cave and the Light. I usually think of Charles Sanders Peirce as Descartes most practical critic, and I agree with him that a contrived and methodological doubt is not the best starting place in philosophy.