Chapter 3 Facilities Inspection Manual Food. Subject 3 Compliance Verification Policies and Procedures for Registered Establishments. PDF 1. 26 kb1. Scope. This subject outlines the policy and procedures governing the Compliance Verification activities to be conducted in federally registered fish processing establishments. Subject 1 of this Chapter contains an introduction to Regulatory Verification. August 2003 1 CPUC ENERGY EFFICIENCY POLICY MANUAL VERSION 2 Prepared by the Energy Division August 2003. DAM/DAM-aboutcfia-sujetacia/STAGING/images-images/acco_audit_2013_qms_appb_1395345315035_eng.jpg' alt='Manual Program Quality Quality Objectives Examples' title='Manual Program Quality Quality Objectives Examples' />The definitions of the terms used in Compliance Verifications are included in Definitions at the front of the manual. Policy. 2. 1 Guiding Principles. All registered establishments shall be evaluated for compliance with regulatory requirements through Compliance Verifications, performed as prescribed by these policies and procedures. The CFIA will usually commence scheduling Compliance Verifications for a registered establishment when the Systems Verification of its documented QMP plan is completed. The Compliance Verification approach is based on working co operatively with establishments as they implement and make incremental changes to their QMP plan to meet the QMP Reference Standard and comply with the Fish Inspection Regulations. The Fish Inspection Program Compliance Management Process is intended to deal with those establishments that are unwilling or unable to implement or maintain an effective QMP. Compliance Verifications will be conducted using internationally recognised principles and methods of auditing. Compliance Verifications are intended to evaluate an establishments QMP as a whole, not just individual operations or operation types. However, a single CV will not involve an assessment of every process or activity in an establishments QMP. The scope of a Compliance Verification outlines the boundaries or limits of activities planned for the CV, i. QMP will be investigated. The scope of a CV on an establishment may cover the implementation of all elements of the establishments QMP i. Prerequisite plan, RAP, and HACCP plan. However, the scope of some CVs will be more focussed and will not cover all elements. Where a Compliance Verification identifies non conformities, the processor will be required to develop a Corrective Action Plan CAP acceptable to the CFIA that outlines a schedule for addressing the non conformities. In keeping with the co operative approach outlined in 2. The PPM is currently being updated. These changes reflect the current Design Presentation Standards for all advertised projects on the State Highway System SHS. As. The ISO 9000 family of quality management systems standards is designed to help organizations ensure that they meet the needs of customers and other stakeholders. Preparing a Project Plan A SelfStudy Guide March 2004 Page ii 2004 by Adele Sommers Section 1. ProjectProgram Description. Quality Objectives Discover How Quality Objectives Matrix Can Help You Improve Quality Performance Management. CV team leader and a processor are unable to reach agreement on the findings of a CV or the resulting Corrective Action Plan, the CV team leader should inform the processor that further clarification or guidance may be sought from the Operational supervisormanager. Organisation and Scheduling of CVs. A Compliance Verification includes pre notification of the CV to the processor identification of a CV team leader and team members a CV plan, schedule and time frames a review of establishment background information, including previous CVs development of CV checklists specific to the establishment an evaluation of the establishment conducted on site in the processing facility completion of Non conformity Reports if required, and a Compliance Verification Exit Report andfollow up activities, where necessary, to confirm that corrective actions have been completed. CFIA will normally inform the processing establishment in advance of the date on which a Compliance Verification will be carried out. However, CFIA inspectors retain the right to perform inspection activities at federally registered fish processing establishments at any time, as authorized by the Fish Inspection Act. The selection of appropriate CV team leaders and team members will be at the discretion of individual CFIA Operations Managers and Supervisors. To conduct Compliance Verifications, CFIA inspectors must have successfully completed all applicable training courses. Inspectors must also be participating in, or have completed, the QMP Mentorship Program. Mentorship is a supportive on the job training, coaching and assessment process, in which a more experienced inspector shares their knowledge and experience with a less experienced inspector, with the goal of achieving consistent application of CV policy and procedures. As stated in 2. 1. Compliance Verification will not assess every process or activity in an establishments QMP. Instead, for each CV a representative sample or slice of the QMP will be chosen. Within the boundaries of the CV scope, the slice will outline the specific processes or activities that will be examined. For each slice chosen the significant points for health safety or regulatory compliance are selected a thorough, focussed evaluation is completed to confirm that the system controls are in place and that they adhere to the QMP plan andonce evidence is gathered and a conclusion is reached, the CV team member moves on to the next element in the CV. Each Compliance Verification of an establishment except for the initial CV will take previous results into account, so that the CV can examine products and processes that were not previously evaluated and, if necessary, concentrate on progress made on long term corrective actions and areas of concern previously identified. With the goal of developing and maintaining a Continuous Record, the results of CVs conducted over time will flow together to form a compliance picture of the establishment. CV teams will conduct Follow up activities to verify that Corrective Action Plans have been followed. When the short term corrective actions have been completed, and the plans for long term corrective actions have been found to be acceptable, this will lead to closure of the Compliance Verification. The scheduling of Compliance Verifications will be based on Establishment CV Priorities, determined as described in section 3. CFIA Operations Managers and Supervisors will be responsible for developing overall Compliance Verification plans for their respective areas of responsibility. These plans will be based on the target CV frequencies set out in section 3. From these plans, individual CVs can then be scheduled for each processing facility within the area of responsibility. Product Action. Where the acceptability of fish products is brought into question through the identification of a non conformity during a CV, and the establishment cannot resolve the problem as part of a Corrective Action Plan, inspectors are to take appropriate product action. Carmageddon 2 High Resolution Downloadable Pictures. Detention or seizure may be necessary to control fish products that are tainted, decomposed or unwholesome, fraudulently presented or otherwise fail to meet the requirements of the Fish Inspection Act, Fish Inspection Regulations or other applicable legislation. Procedures. 3. 1 The Slice Approach. For each Compliance Verification, a representative sample or slice approach will be taken. This means that each CV will focus on one or a limited number of products andor processes. To illustrate the slice approach, consider a ready to eat plant processing shrimp and crab as an example. Using the slice approach, an example of a typical CV in this processing plant would look at the shrimp operation, but not the crab for plant sanitation, look at the state of cleanliness, the effectiveness of the clean up procedures, and the training instructions for the cleanup crew working in the shrimp processing room for employee hygiene, look at the controls, practices, level of knowledge and understanding of personnel working in the shrimp processing room look at a proportional number of SOPs that would not be covered under the HACCP plan andor control measures associated with the safety of the product as an example, or areas of poor compliance based on establishment history andif there are eight ingredients used in the process, look at three of these ingredients. When the HACCP element is included in the Scope of the CV and that element includes CCPs, then all CCPs related to the product being produced within the scope of the CV are to be fully assessed, along with any associated SOPs.